Thursday 15 August 2013

How many players is Torts gonna use?

Call me Nazzy Moruzzi.  I have been a hardcore Canuck and hockey fan for 15 years.  This is my blog, my goal is to present some intelligent Canuck analysis for the hardcore Canuck fan.  Lets talk some hockey.
For my first post, I want to pivot off of an article written by Blake Murphy on CanucksArmy.  Check it out here.  It's a good read (so good that I'm going to steal one of his charts).  Blake is discussing how many players we should expect the Canucks to use during the next season (how far down the depth chart we can expect them to go).  Check out this chart that Blake provides for us.

# of Players used by each team
SeasonTortorellaCanucksNHL Average
2005-2006303729
2006-20072834                        28.6
2007-2008353628.4
2008-2009Didn't Coach         3229.5
2009-2010353229.3
2010-2011353929.7
2011-2012323529.8
2012-2013            353328
Average overall 32.934.829

This is a chart of how many players were used by the Canucks and Tortorella for each season since the lockout, along with the league average for each year and average totals at the bottom.  From this chart, Blake decides that the Canucks shouldn't expect much of a change in depth chart usage. I disagree with his conclusion and some additional information should clarify why I feel this way.  Here's a chart of hit totals for Tortorella teams and Canuck teams for each season since the 04/05 lockout.

# of Hits by each team
SeasonTortorellaCanucksNHL Rank
2005-2006975135828th and 11th
2006-200712751206                        24th and 28th
2007-20081616123211th and 28th
2008-2009Didn't Coach         131530th
2009-2010233014992nd and 27th
2010-2011233317911st and 20th
2011-2012241918261st and 18th
2012-2013            141310203rd and 23rd
Average overall 1765.85711405.875

 Along with a chart of blocked shot totals for the same time period.

# of Shots Blocked by each team
SeasonTortorellaCanucksNHL Rank
2005-2006107596516th and 24th
2006-20071006870                        26th and 28th
2007-200810729888th and 19th
2008-2009Didn't Coach         99322nd
2009-2010117699111th and 24th
2010-2011130110714th and 25th
2011-2012133810194th and 27th
2012-2013            7735666th and 27th
Average overall 1105.8571931.625


The first thing that jumps out at me is the apparent shift in philosophy for Tortorella between 06/07 and 07/08.  For the first two years, Tortorella's teams are similar to the Canucks with low hit totals and low shots blocked totals.  Since then, his teams have hit and blocked a lot more (typically in the top 10 or even top 5 in both categories) while the Canucks have stuck with a less physically wearing style of hockey.
I've often thought that this was intentional on the part of either Vigneault or Gillis.  The Canucks travel more than most teams and less physical play should reduce physical wear.  Also, the Canucks of this era have not been designed to be a crash and bang team.
Which makes me wonder many things.  In particular, should we expect a different coaching style from Tortorella on the west coast?  He appears to have altered his style to adapt to the "new NHL" on the east coast, can we expect the same thing for the west coast?
Assuming Torts doesn't change his style, how many injuries can the Canucks expect next year?
My educated guess, more than we're used to.  Injuries are unpredictable and there are sample size issues but it appears that Tortorella's shift in coaching style brought an increase in injuries from 07-13 (where he averaged 34.25 players per season) compared to 05-07 (where he averaged 29 players for those two seasons). 
Meanwhile, the Canucks have played a less physical style but incurred a similar number of injuries.  It makes me think that we can expect to see a lot of injuries this year, and when you consider our lack of depth compared to recent seasons and other teams, this expectation can quickly turn to concern.  Hopefully I'm wrong but the Canuck travel schedule plus Tortorella hitting and shot blocking sounds like a recipe for a lot of injuries to me.

No comments:

Post a Comment